Showing posts sorted by date for query vitamin d. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query vitamin d. Sort by relevance Show all posts

June 7, 2013

Phosphate Additives Promote Hardening of the Arteries

Several weeks ago I posted about the disturbing link between blood phosphate levels and heart disease, pointing out that people eating low carb diets have a unique exposure to phosphates because they are added to so many of the meats you buy at the grocery store and order in restaurants. In this post I will explain more about what these phospate additives are and why they are so dangerous to our health.

Phosphates are compounds that contain phosphorous and oxygen. They are essential to the construction of every cell in our body as phosphates make up the backbone of DNA, They form essential components in cell membranes and are essential to the proper growth of plants. Adenoside Triphosphate (ATP) is the molecule every cell uses used to store energy. Without it, we're dead meat.

Therefore we get a dose of phosphates any time we eat any meat or vegetable. These are "organic phosphates" which are deeply bound into the structure of the foods we eat--so much so that only 40-60% of the phosphate we consume is actually bioavailable. The rest goes through us undigested.

But these organic are not the phosphates that pose a threat to health. The problem phosphates are the "inorganic phosphates"--chunks of phosphate containing rock--that are added to our foods. The are commonly used as preservatives, flavor additives, and to keep cream from separating in dairy products. Phosphoric acid, which converts to phosphate in our bodies, is added to soda to keep brown sodas from turning jet black, which would make them unappealing to most people. Phosphates are also frequently used to provide the chalky white pill material that holds the supplements you buy in pill form.

Unlike the organic phosphates these inorganic phosphates are 100% bioavailable. That means if you eat 500 mg of calcium phosphate, disodium phosphate, or any of the many other inorganic phosphates added to processed foods or supplements, the whole 500 mg will be absorbed. When it is, it will go into your bloodstream where where will raise your serum phosphate level.

It has long been known that consuming inorganic phosphates can be very dangerous for  people with severe kidney disease, as failing kidneys can't remove phosphates from teh blood, and these phosphates precipitate out in the kidney, destroying what little function is left.  But while doctors may be aware of this, few of them know that consuming inorganic phosphates also poses a major risk to normal people, because it can promote heart disease.

We know from several well-conducted studies that there is a direct link between serum phosphate level and heart disease. As a recently published review article explains, " Higher serum phosphate levels were independently associated with coronary artery calcification, vascular stiffness, left ventricular hypertrophy, and carotid artery disease, even among individuals with normal kidney function and serum phosphate levels within the normal range."

A study that matched CAC scans to serum phosphate levels verified that rising serum phosphate levels correlated directly to rising Agaston scores in a population who had completely normal kidney function.

The most comprehensive  study to investigate the impact of phosphates on heart disease was a study of the Framingham Offspring. It looked at serum phosphate levels in a group of over 3,000 normal people and then looked to see which of them had developed heart disease sixteen years later. It found that:
... a higher level of serum phosphorus was associated with an increased CVD [cardiovascular disease] risk in a continuous fashion. ... Individuals in the highest serum phosphorus quartile experienced a multivariable-adjusted 1.55-fold CVD risk ... compared with those in the lowest quartile... Serum calcium was not related to CVD risk.
Does Eating Inorganic Phosphates Raise Serum Phosphate Levels? 

After reading this, I could not help but wonder if those high serum phosphate levels that caused heart disease were caused by eating diets high in phosphate or whether people destined to get heart disease migh6 have high serum phosphate levels as a side effect of an undiagnosed preexisting health issue.

Could eating a diet high in phosphates be all it took to raise serum phosphate levels? This question was elegantly answered by a study published back in 1977.

In this study subjects who were allowed to eat only the foods supplied by the researchers were, for four weeks, fed a control diet free of any phosphate additives. Then, for the next four weeks, they were fed a diet that contained the identical amount of calories, protein, fat, and carbohydrate as the control diet but this diet was made up of foods containing inorganic phosphate additives, like American cheese, soda, and processed meats.

The report explains, "The average phosphorus content of the daily menu was 979 mg during the control period and 2124 mg during the test period." After a month of eating the foods with the added phosphates, the study participants blood was tested and it was found that they had experienced a dramatic rise in serum phosphates, accompanied by a decrease in serum calcium.  The addition of the phosphates to their diets also caused digestive distress to many of the participants--in some cases it persisted throughout the whole study.

When their serum phosphate levels were measured, they were found to have "increased from 3.76 ±0.38 mg/100 ml during the control period to 4.43 ±0.30 mg/ 100 ml [mg/dl] during the high-phosphorus period."  This was an 18% rise in serum phosphate level.  So yes, upping dietary consumption of inorganic phosphates will raise serum phosphate a lot, even in completely normal people.

And it is also worth noting that the amount of phosphate being consumed by the subjects in this study is likely to be far less than that consumed by the average person today since they were being fed a controlled diet containing only 2,200 calories.  Higher caloric intakes would result in higher intakes of inorganic phosphates, and higher serum phosphate levels, too. And people eating "healthy diets" who use supplements might be getting even higher amounts, since many chalky pill substrates are made mostly of dicalcium phosphate.

How Damaging Is This Added Phosphate?

The Framingham Offspring study found that in normal participants whose serum phosphate levels were in the top quarter of readings for the whole research group at the beginning of the 16 year study   there was a 55% higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease at the end of the study .  This is a big leap in risk, especially when it is attributed to a factor that is completely ignored by doctors, health authorities, and food companies.

Though we can't be confident in comparing the blood phosphate levels in the 1977 diet study and the Framingham Offspring study, as using different lab techniques will give different reference ranges, it's worth noting that the serum phosphate value representing beginning of the highest quartile in the Framingham Offspring Study--the level at which cardiovascular risk was 55% higher--was only 20% higher than the top of the lowest quartile.

So since we have seen that boosting the phosphate intake of a 2,200 calorie diet can easily achieve an 18% rise in serum phosphate levels,  it seems very likely that dietary consumption of phosphates, alone, is enough to boost serum levels into the range that correlates with a higher risk of heart disease.

Is it the Phosphates Causing Heart Disease or Are They A Lifestyle Marker?

Since inorganic phosphate intakes rise dramatically when people eat diets high in fast food and soda, it would be easy to dismiss the link between serum phosphates and heart disease as being due not to the phosphates themselves, but to the unhealthy diet that results in those high serum phosphate levels. In short, to point to serum phosphates as a marker of a diet rich in junk food.

But there is some other research that contradicts this argument.  The researchers who published the Framingham Offspring Study cite a study that found that  "... higher phosphorus levels increase the propensity of mineral deposition in vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro."  That study found that
HSMCs -[Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells] cultured in media containing normal physiological levels of inorganic phosphate (1.4 mmol/L) did not mineralize. In contrast, HSMCs cultured in media containing phosphate levels comparable to those seen in hyperphosphatemic individuals (>1.4 mmol/L) showed dose-dependent increases in mineral deposition.
Furthermore,  exposure to high levels of phosphates induces a phenotypic transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells into osteoblast-like cells that express biochemical markers characteristic of the cells that turn into bone.

What this means in plain English  is that in a petri dish, cells from heart arteries were fine when exposed to normal levels of phosphates, but when the levels rose to abnormally high levels the artery cells started to act like bone stem cells and fill up with tiny bits of rock. The higher the amount of phosphate they were exposed to, the more rock.

The Framingham researchers also cite a study showing that "higher serum phosphorus levels increase circulating PTH [parathyroid hormone] levels even in healthy individuals," pointing out that "Higher PTH levels may be proinflammatory" as they raise the level of a substance, IL-6, linked to heart disease.

These findings suggest that the problem is that when you eat too much phosphate-containing rock, that rock ends up floating around your bloodstream until it precipitates out in your heart muscle (and other) cells.

Phosphate, Vitamin D, and Niacin

An interesting side note to the issue of high serum phosphate is the finding that rising serum phosphates will lower Vitamin D production as Vitamin D is one of the regulators of blood phosphate levels.  (Discussed HERE).  If you have abnormally low Vitamin D levels when not supplementing Vitamin D, this could be pointing to the fact that your serum phosphate level is unhealthily high.

In patients with kidney failure, there is some evidence that supplemental niacin lowers the very high serum phosphate levels characteristic of kidney failure, though there is no research to answer the question of whether niacin lowers phosphate levels in people with normal kidneys. But it makes a lot more sense to lower serum phosphate levels by cutting out of your diet as much inorganic phosphate as possible rather than to drive with one foot on your physiological accelerator and one on the brake, which is what you do when you attempt to lower these levels by taking a supplement while consuming the phosphates.

What's Next?

I'll be writing more about the role of inorganic phosphates in our diets and what we can do to achieve normal serum phosphate levels. For now, your homework is to start reading labels for all the foods and supplements you consume, to see how many items you eat each day contain added inorganic phosphate.

Since I started doing this, back when I published my first post about the dangers of high phosphate levels, I've been at first surprised, and then horrified, to see just how much of what I have thought of as "healthy" foods and supplements are full of these dangerous, inorganic phosphate minerals.



March 11, 2013

March Diabetes News Snippet Post

Here are all the news items posted in March:

Jenny said...
People taking Byetta, Victoza, Januvia, and Onglyza had less heart failure than those not on these drugs. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130310164109.htm

However, it is likely this is because Avandia and Actos CAUSE heart failure, rather than that these other drugs prevent it. People are rarely put on both families of drugs at once.

It may also be because these GLP-1 related drugs are mostly prescribed to affluent, younger people with diabetes and good health insurance, while poorer people are put on the cheap sulfonylurea drugs which are now known to raise the risk of heart attacks.
Jenny said...
Paleo fans will probably ignore the news that Mummy CT Scans Show Preindustrial Hunter Gatherers Had Clogged Arteries. From the report "The researchers performed CT scans of 137 mummies from across four continents and found artery plaque in every single population studied, from preagricultual hunter-gatherers in the Aleutian Islands to the ancient Puebloans of southwestern United States."

So plaque probably is some byproduct of an adaptation in the way humans process calcium--probably one that is a byproduct of the genetic changes that led to our species' distinctive bigger brains and smaller digestive tracts.

The Paleo diet is useful in helping cut back on junk food, but the idea that ancient humans were healthier than we are is almost certainly a fantasy. The life expectancies of junk food chomping modern day humans is far longer than that of any pre-agricultural peoples, if only because we have effective treatment for injuries and contagious diseases.
Jenny said...
Exposure to DDT in womb results in high blood pressure decades later. http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/DDT-exposure-in-womb-tied-to-hypertension-4346800.php

I remember playing outside in the summer in 1954, and the spray truck passing by spraying huge clouds of DDT. We would take deep breaths of the stuff which had a curious smell. Later, before we went to sleep, my mom would spray my bedroom with it and then I'd crawl right into bed.

Maybe my high blood pressure isn't so mysterious!
RLL said...
Having been, along with sibs, the victims of enraged ground wasp nests, my favorite revenge at 8-10 years old was DDT to the beasts.
Jenny said...
A newly discovered, fatal virus works by activating DDP-4 receptors. However, the diabetes drugs (Januvia and Onglyza) that suppress these receptors do not inhibit the virus.

Reuters: Scientists find how deadly virus infects human cells
Jenny said...
More problems with all incretin drugs--Byetta, Januvia, Onglyza, Victoza, etc. How many people will suffer life changing complications before the FDA acts? I bet your doctor is completely unaware of this ratcheting up of concern.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/PrimaryCare/Diabetes/37890
Jenny said...
A bakery is found to have put sugar in its sugar-free baked goods. The really sad part is that no one seems to understand that the FLOUR in the baked goods is digested into glucose every bit as toxic to people with diabetes as the sucrose. (See last line for what I mean.)

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-butterfly-bakery-sugar-20130314,0,7328666.story
Jenny said...
Industry strong-arms EPA onto allowing another very dangerous chemical to stay in your drinking water.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/jan-june13/epa_03-15.html
Jenny said...
This is to Skippy Pea, I deleted your comment because you had what looks like a ununintended Autocorrect" issue, but the answer to your question is that I don't recommend any protein meal replacements. I don't think they help with dieting and the ingredients are usually cheap omega 6 oils, chemical additives, and poor quality proteins. Why not try some Greek Yogurt with nuts and perhaps some berries instead?
Jenny said...
Victoza (Liraglutide) does not provide significant weight loss in a new study. This reinforces my belief that it isn't as effective a drug as Byetta, while causing much more troubling side effects.

It produced only 4% more weight loss than a worthless placebo. That's 8 lbs lost more than on placebo for someone weighing 200 lbs--which you can easily accomplish without drugs by eating a very low carb diet for a month.

Note that this was on a high dose regimen, and that this drug has been connected with both thyroid cancer and pancreatitis at normal doses.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/18/us-novonordisk-idUSBRE92H0EY20130318
Jenny said...
Some new research supports the "hygiene hypothesis" that Type 1 Diabetes is becoming epidemic because kids are growing up too clean and not encountering bacteria etc at critical stages of the development of the immune system.

Practical takeaway: let your kids play outside in real dirt when they are young and don't use antibiotic soaps.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130318203334.htm
Jenny said...
Potent statins linked to acute kidney injury. "Potent statins" are defined as:

Rosuvastatin (e.g. Crestor) at doses of 10mg or higher.
Atorvastatin (e.g. Lipitor) at doses of 20mg or higher.
Simvastatin (e.g., Zocor) at doses of 40mg or more.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2013/03/19/statin-kidney.html
Jenny said...
Interesting but very small study about the impact of supplementing with Vitamin D on various genes. Note that quite a few much larger studies have found ZERO impact of such supplementation on Type 1 diabetes, MS, or any other already existing autoimmune condition. If there is a benefit in supplementing with Vitamin D it occurs only before you have developed an autoimmunity.

Also note that they did measure blood levels after the supplementation which ended up on average in the low end of the normal range at 32 ng/ml. They did not observe what happens if you oversupplement and reach the much higher levels where nasty things can start happening to your calcium metabolism.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/03/130320212824.htm
Jenny said...
The One Touch Verio meter has been recalled. Details here:

http://diabetes.webmd.com/news/20130325/glucose-meter-recall
Jenny said...
Duh. Tech devices don't make significant changes in A1c--when not coupled with INFORMATION about how to really lower blood sugar.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Endocrinology/Diabetes/38139

You can lower your blood sugar dramatically without using any technology but a blood sugar meter by using this technique:

How to Lower Your Blood Sugar
Jenny said...
Scientists discover how Metformin stops cells from being cancerous--it blocks overproduction of inflammatory cytokines.

Science Daily: Scientists Discover How Drug Prevents Aging and Cancer Progression
Jenny said...
High potency statins--high dose Lipitor and Crestor, for example, raise the incidence of hospitalizations for acute kidney injury. http://www.healio.com/endocrinology/cardiometabolic-disorders/news/online/%7B7A0F7760-A043-4AE8-9131-659AD4E6525C%7D/high-potency-statins-may-increase-risk-for-kidney-injury

December 10, 2012

Research Posted on The BS101 FB Page Since September

It's time to collect and post all the substantive, research-related posts that have been posted on the Blood Sugar 101 Facebook Page.

As you can see there is the usual mix of disturbing findings about environmental pollutants, bad diet advice, dangerous prescription drugs, mistaken medical policy, and the benefits of lowering blood sugar by cutting back on carbohydrates.

I have put red arrows (==>) next to a few studies that have immediate, serious health implications for people with diabetes.

I continue to be less than thrilled with FB, but since so many people use it I've concluded it is a pretty good way to reach people who would otherwise never find this blog.

====
Study: After weight loss, Roux-en-Y causes dramatic post-meal blood sugar spikes. Banding makes no difference in blood sugar. Stats argue against either being a "cure" for diabetes, doesn't it.

See this chart:
http://www.jci.org/articles/view/64895/figure/4

From this article http://www.jci.org/articles/view/64895
=====

Ketones may why calorie restriction leads to life extension. So don't starve yourself, cut back on carbs.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121206142025.htm
=====

Apparently, free speech extends to drug reps lying about prescription drugs. We're all screwed.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/04/us-offlabel-conviction-idUSBRE8B21DC20121204
=====

"Countries that use high fructose corn syrup in their food supply have a 20% greater prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with countries that do not" Study says.

http://americannewsreport.com/high-fructose-corn-syrup-blamed-for-worldwide-diabetes-epidemic-8816853
=====
Dangerous concentrations of PCBs are found in many women's blood. They are known to promote diabetes.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121128143944.htm
=====

You'll find lots of low carb holiday treats including cookies and other desserts here that you can indulge in without spiking your blood sugar.

http://www.tudiabetes.org/group/lowcarbrecipeswap/forum/topics/holiday-foods?commentId=583967%3AComment%3A2487538
=====

Flame retardants are hormone disrupters that promote obesity. You can't avoid them if you own upholstered furniture.

http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Chemicals-in-furniture-hard-to-avoid-4072857.php
=====

What a shocker: The Wash Post notices that drug companies have polluted high impact medical research studies.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2012/11/25/bias-may-taint-big-pharma-research.html
=====

A mouse study finds the specific cancer gene that is silenced when dietary carbs are restricted.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121115133152.htm
=====

PCBs which concentrate in body fat (and therefore in the fat of the meat we eat) not only cause diabetes, they lead to infertility. This is a serious issue for people eating low carb diets, alas. Organic meat may be better, but the pervasiveness of these toxins in our environment makes them difficult to avoid with husbandry practices, as the animals still have to breath polluted air and drink polluted water.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121114084027.htm
=====

A UK study concludes that screening for diabetes doesn't prevent bad outcomes. No one draws the obvious conclusion--UK treatment for diabetes sucks. Which it does.

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)61422-6/abstract
=====

BPA slows thyroid in pregnant animals and their offspring.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121114083226.htm
=====

==> The EU has approved dapagliflozin which will be sold as Forxiga. This drug blocks absorption of glucose in the kidney, so you lower blood sugar by peeing away glucose. The FDA did NOT approve it because of possible liver damage and signals of breast and bladder cancer. Do NOT take this new drug until it has been on the market for at least 5 years and we know a bit more about what it really does.

http://medcitynews.com/2012/11/eu-approves-bristol-astra-diabetes-drug-forxiga-after-fda-rejection-due-to-cancer-risk/
=====

Arsenic, DDE, dioxin and pesticides all are strongly associated with both diabetes and obesity. It's NOT personal choices damaging our children.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121113134928.htm
=====

==> FDA committee approved very long lasting basal insulin. But it isn't better than Lantus/Levemir and the 70/30 mix makes it impossible to cover post-meal spikes safely.

http://www.healio.com/endocrinology/diabetes/news/online/%7B61213728-C9A3-46E8-AD49-0010CE03911E%7D/Insulin-degludec-degludecaspart-receive-FDA-committee-approval-in-8-4-vote
=====

More evidence that sulfonylureas are worse for the heart than metformin. There is a well-understood reason why this should be true. They are discussed HERE

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121107122453.htm
=====

Doctors really are biased against fat people. If you thought your doctor was dissing you, it wasn't paranoia.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121107200036.htm
====

==> Low vitamin D levels correlate to longevity in this new study. Perhaps because high levels often result in calcium in arteries.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121105130355.htm
=====

==> If you have heart disease and diabetes don't let a cardiologist rush you into stenting, the way this NEJM editorial explains they will. A major long-term study found coronary artery bypass produces much better results in people with diabetes than stenting.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe1212278
=====

Another study proves that soy is useless against menopausal symptoms. Since it also promotes autoimmune attack by promoting leaky gut, wise women avoid soy.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121101110633.htm
=====

The radical weight loss surgeries can lead to significant bone loss.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121102115342.htm
=====

==> If you have any signs of early diabetic kidney disease Pradaxa could be very dangerous. The FDA is being defensive since it approved it. Doctors are rarely aware of the fine print about who should NOT get a new, heavily marketed drug.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/business/a-rising-anti-stroke-drug-is-tied-to-risk-of-bleeding-deaths.html
=====

Cochrane Review: Cranberry juice for Urinary Tract Infections is a myth promoted by people funded by the cranberry industry. It's extremely high in sugar and terrible for blood sugar. High blood sugar promotes UTIs.

http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD001321/cranberries-for-preventing-urinary-tract-infections
=====

Losing weight using a low fat/high carb diet that raises blood sugar won't reduce heart disease. Duh. It isn't the weight. Note the supposed experts never ask, "What diet?" But just assume "diet" doesn't work. The "experts" cited are drawing huge sums as they are  on the payroll of drug companies as "consultants" and other weaselly terms meant to hide the fact that they are drug pitchmen.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/moderate-weight-loss-alone-doesnt-lower-heart-disease-risk-in-diabetics-study-shows/2012/10/19/89cee7cc-1a22-11e2-aa6f-3b636fecb829_story.html
=====

Ex- top insurance exec (at a company I used to write software for) reveals how insurers deceitfully manipulate data to make it look like people are uninsured by choice.

http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/10/15/11413/opinion-myths-healthy-uninsured
=====

The Sweetarts sold at drug store and convenience store counters have shrunk. The new nutritional info shows they are no longer 2 grams each. Now they are 1.6 grams. Important to know if you use them to correct lows.
=====

Doctors finally admit that lowering post-meal blood sugars is ALL you need to do to avoid heart attack. But they also want to link it to DPP-4 inhibitors, ignoring the cancer and immune system risks. If you can lower your post-meal blood sugar without these dangerous drugs, do it.

http://www.healio.com/endocrinology/diabetes/news/print/endocrine-today/{3d16eba1-1568-4b2d-8e92-b516391831f7}/dpp-iv-inhibitors-appear-to-reduce-cv-risk-in-type-2-diabetes-
====

It took 6.5 years to "decades" before the benefits of tight control became obvious in the landmark diabetes studies. Lowering A1c DOES help. If you wait another decade until ignorant doctors finally admit lowering your A1c 5% range using SAFE technique WILL significantly lower the rates of all complications, it may be too late for you as the higher blood sugars associated with 7% A1cs will have damaged and destroyed your organs.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1208169
=====

BD is announcing a new Ultra-Fine needle that is supposedly even thinner than their previous ones. My experience with the short ultra-fines is that they are painless. The new ones should be even better.  Note, however, that contrary to what you may be told, many of us find we can get several days worth of injections from one pen needle before it starts to blunt.

http://www.bd.com/us/diabetes/page.aspx?cat=7002&id=7409
====

Almost all rice contains the inorganic form of arsenic that’s known to cause bladder, lung and skin cancers. And to destroy pancreas' ability to secrete insulin, too.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/fda-working-on-plan-to-limit-arsenic-levels-in-rice/2012/09/18/3238a578-0133-11e2-b257-e1c2b3548a4a_story.html

October 1, 2012

More Adventures in Very Low Carb Dieting

So this morning begins the second week of my very low carb diet experiment. Here's what LifeForm has to say about what I ate.



Sodium: 1568 mg
Vitamin A: 112%
Vitamin C: 95%
Calcium 83%
Iron 27%

Since I only ate one meal away from home, I was able to weigh all my portions and use label information.

The low iron is fine. Too much iron is a problem for many of us with diabetes and many older people. Since I dumped my cast iron cooking pan, when tested mine is always normal. If it dropped, the cast iron pan would quickly solve that problem.

My weight this morning was 142.4. lbs

My average fasting weight for the past week was 144.0

This average doesn't include my morning weight the day that I started the diet.

This represents a loss of 2.3 lbs since the morning after my first full day of dieting. (I did not use my starting weight as it was artificially high thanks to having eaten a very salty meal the previous day.)

Boring Food Does Make It Easier to Diet

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I have been home-testing Stephan Guyenet's palatability thesis. So far it looks like he may have a point. One huge benefit of eating almost the same food every day and doing no cooking fancier than frying up an egg or baking a chicken is that it cuts way down on thinking about food.

A few days ago I stopped in to visit one of the active low carb forums (one that banned me a few years ago, most likely for telling the truth about the bogus "low carb" crap the site owner sells.)  The main thing that struck me was how obsessed with food all the posts were. Everyone was posting recipes, many of them extremely high in calories, and often they were for cakes, desserts, and candy-like treats. Just reading the site made me start craving food.

Bad!

The rest of the time when I knew exactly what I was going to be eating I did not think about food until it was time to eat my [tiny] meal. No way was I going to be slavering thinking about eggs with cheese for breakfast, salad with meat and cheese for lunch, yogurt with sunflower seeds for dinner.

Thinking about food may in fact get the brain secreting hormones that change our metabolism in ways that fight weight loss.

Take Away Lesson: Though variety is essential for maintaining a low carb lifestyle, and also likely to be very important for sustaining a successful diet phase, it might be a very good strategy to eat one set group of foods each week and only research (and shop) for the next week's foods during a short period of time. Look at the recipe sites and cookbooks before you start your weight loss diet--or while you are maintaining.

More Thoughts on Glycogen

When I started this experiment I was taking 1000 mg of metformin every day. I had to stop taking it mid-week because my blood sugars were so low that I didn't need even the small lowering that metformin produces. 


After the first day's loss--which was likely mostly salt from that Vietnamese lunch, I didn't lose anything for about 4 days, then I dropped another couple pounds. I have often observed that metformin blocks the early loss of glycogen that occurs when I eat a ketogenic diet. My guess is that stopping the metformin allowed me to lose more glycogen.

I'm starting to think that metformin somehow "locks" the liver glycogen which is why it can be so helpful in lowering fasting glucose. But it also means you can't lose glycogen when you are in a ketogenic state. Since that stored glycogen isn't accessible when you take metformin, this isn't an issue, but it can make for odd patterns of weight loss.

In any event, as gratifying as the number on the scale my be most of the weight loss is glycogen and will come back when I eat more than 70 grams of glucose (my own personal ketogenic threshhold. Many people's are higher because they are larger than me.)  I maintain around 100 g a day, so I won't really know how much fat I lost for a while.

NOTE: If you don't understand what glycogen is and the role it plays in weight loss this topic is covered extensively in my book Diet 101: The Truth About Low Carb Diets.  You'll find a brief summary online HERE.

Ketones

I was turning ketone strips pink all the time, mostly "small", with one "moderate" and one "light" reading. Interestingly the "light" reading occurred when I was feeling really hungry and before a drop in scale weight. Perhaps that is a sign I was burning newly freed-up glycogen as the metformin wore off.

Hunger 

I had long periods when I wasn't hungry, but noticed that I did get hungry--often very hungry--in the evening 4 or 5 hours after my last meal. (No snacks on this diet!) I resorted to the "Two Gram Cure" and it worked. When I tested my blood sugar at these hungry time it was usually in the 70s. 


This confirms my belief that for me, at least, it is blood sugar level that causes hunger.

Wheatlessness

Since my blood sugar normalized on the Coenzyme Q10 I have been eating quite a lot of wheat. I went completely grain free this week, but so far I can't say that I noticed any of the magical changes claimed for going wheat or gluten free.

I don't have any of the kinds of antibodies associated with gluten allergy nor do I have any history or family history of autoimmune disease, so this is predictable. I still had some heart burn, mostly because yogurt causes me to have heart burn.


Blood Pressure

It's up, sadly. This often happens when I eat a very low carb diet, contrary to the "one-size-fits-all" claims of those who make millions selling diet hope. After one day when it dropped, it went right back up and was alarmingly high another morning, though responsive to medication (captopril). Some of this may have to do with it getting cold here on our windy hilltop and my refusing to turn on the heat (expensive oil) while the calendar read "September." Cold will raise blood pressure, but probably not as much as mine is rising.

Blood Sugar

Fasting this morning was 83 mg/dl, again suggesting that the metformin is wearing off. Post meals it is dropping into the 70s. For the last thee mornings my fastings were in the 70s. 


Energy Level

Not great, in fact, I've been really droopy much of the time. I have had some trouble sleeping and I have been having those very vibrant dreams that often come with ketosis. 


Plans for This Week

I'm going to stay in ketosis this week but raise my calories to 1250 as I don't think starvation diets are smart. The extra calories will be fat. Not having me eat with him is a stress for my Sweetie, who, as men are prone to do, has lost more weight simply because he is having to get his own meals and we aren't doing any social eating, than I am eating like an anorectic bird.

I'm remembering the social toll that is taken by not making meals a major part of socializing. I will be glad to get back to my usual regimen, hopefully having eliminated the carb creep that happened over this past summer. I'd like to stay maintaining at my usual 100-110 g a day level and 1600 calories a day (which is a tad higher than what the calculator says I should eat, but is what I can eat without feeling like I'm starving myself.)

Comments?

May 14, 2012

Links to Studies Posted on the FaceBook Blood Sugar 101 Page

Because posts on FB scroll off I'm reposting the posts I've made on the Blood Sugar 101 FaceBook Page so that they will still be available here when they are gone from FB.

THE POSTS:


Scientists may not understand what causes painful neuropathy, but I hear all the time from people who have cured it by dropping bgs below 140 mg/dl at all times.

Scientists uncover potential treatment for painful side effect of diabetes

----

FDA about to approve Lorcaserin which achieves 5% weight loss in less than 50% of obese people over a year. Magic it ain't.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0909809

----

If you want to stop smoking and not gain weight, cut your carbs then quit.

Increased bodyweight after stopping smoking may be due to changes in insulin secretion

----
Researchers "take advantage of a new mouse model of diabetes type 2, which, like humans, develops the disease in adults as result of a high-fat diet." Which means it doesn't have the same diabetes humans get which is genetically almost always from insufficient insulin production combined with factors that make for insulin resistance like mitochondria that burn glucose poorly.

Caffeine can prevent memory loss in diabetes

----
Experimental basal #insulin that lasts 40 hours gives almost the same results as Lantus with slightly less nighttime hypos. But blood sugars still remain high because of the way it's dosed.

Insulin degludec, an ultra-longacting basal insulin, versus insulin glargine in basal-bolus treatment

----
Phthalates have also been linked with #diabetes in older people. Hard to eliminate our exposure. They're in everything.
Washington Post: If the food’s in plastic, what’s in the food?

----

The news about #metformin just keeps getting better. It seems to protect against Parkinson's too!

Metformin can substantially reduce the risk of Parkinson's disease in diabetes, study suggests

---

Serum levels of phthalate metabolites are linked with the development of type 2 diabetes in the elderly, Swedish researchers found.

Medical News:%20Common Chemical Tied to Diabetes in Seniors - in Endocrinology, Diabetes from MedPage

----

This is about Type 1 #diabetes and mice, but it's still interesting and may have an application for Type 2, also.

Magnetic Nanoparticles Predict Diabetes Onset: Researchers from Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital have developed a magnetic nanoparticle-based MRI technique for predicting whether—and when—subjects with a genetic predisposition for diabetes will develop the disease.

http://hms.harvard.edu/content/magnetic-nanoparticles-predict-diabetes-onset

---

Blocking glucagon is way far from being a real treatment for #diabetes but it's an interesting concept.

Targeting glucagon pathway may offer a new approach to treating diabetes

---
Slightly higher than normal blood sugars cause bad pregnancy outcomes, just as they cause #diabetes complications. Will doctors ever challenge the ADA's damagingly high diagnostic criteria?

New pregnancy risk for babies and moms: Overweight moms with moderately high blood sugar raise health risk

----
Humans have evolved unique genes for fat metabolism, which supports our big brain. One reason why rodent research is so misleading.

Genetic adaptation of fat metabolism key to development of human brain

----

Yet another study attributes to weight loss the effect of the mandatory carb-cutting enforced by WLS. The surgeons won't stop until everyone has this surgery. Note, that the incidence of diabetes in the most heaviest subjects in this group was under 10% and dropped by less than 6%. Most obese people will never develop diabetes, despite the hype. You need the genes to get it, and you need to cut carbs to lower your blood sugar. WLS isn't a "cure" it's a way of forcing people to cut carbs involuntarily.

Losing Weight When Obese Can Prevent or Cure Diabetes, Whatever the Initial BMI, Study Suggests

----

Yet another antioxidant vitamin pill turns out to be harmful--Beta Carotene. Eat your veggies, folks and leave the pills on the shelf!

Potential 'dark side' to diets high in beta-carotene

---

Confirmation of what we all know, bananas, oatmeal, and oral drugs won't do it. If only they taught these teens to cut carbs!

TODAY — A Stark Glimpse of Tomorrow — NEJM

also An Editorial on the Same Study.

----
Read this list of unnecessary tests that you should NOT let a cardiologist perform on you. I've had some and refused another despite heavy pressure from an ER doctor. (I'd gone to the ER for something unrelated.) The last one can kill you.

http://choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/5things_12_factsheet_Amer_Coll_Cardio.pdf

From the same site's nephrology page: "Avoid nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in individuals with hypertension or heart failure or CKD of all causes, including diabetes.The use of NSAIDS, including cyclo-oxygenase type 2 (COX-2) inhibitors, for the pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal pain can elevate blood pressure, make antihypertensive drugs less effective, cause fluid retention and worsen kidney function in these individuals. Other agents such as acetaminophen, tramadol or short-term use of narcotic analgesics may be safer than and as effective as NSAIDs."

----

Note that the recommendation is to get this nutrient from food, not pills. Chicken thighs will work. Bake them until crispy, paint with buffalo chicken hot sauce. Yum.Nutrient found in dark meat of poultry, some seafood, may have cardiovascular benefits

A nutrient found in the dark meat of poultry may provide protection against coronary heart disease in women with high cholesterol, according to a new study.

----


Experimental drug stimulates a free fatty acid receptor in the pancreas which causes insulin secretion. And weight gain. What else it does it unknown as the testing on humans was brief and in few subjects.


Medical News:New Diabetes Drug Cuts Glycemic Risk - in Endocrinology, Diabetes from MedPage Today

-----

We recently learned Bisphenol A doubles insulin resistance, so a connection with heart disease is not that mysterious. I wish they'd correlated it with A1c. The EPIC-Norfolk study is the one that first found the tight correlation between A1c and heart disease even in the normal range.

Bisphenol A exposure linked to increased risk of future onset of heart disease

----

Maternal PFOA blood levels => Fat daughters 20 years later. The obesity crisis's NOT just about lifestyle choices poeple.

The levels of the environmental pollutant perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) that mothers had in their blood during pregnancy increased the risk of obesity in their daughters at 20 years of age.

----

Another reason to avoid those vegan "health food" diets. Arsenic is linked to rising rates of Type 2 diabetes. Next time you pick up an organic cereal bar or buy infant formula, you might want to read the label closely.

Arsenic found in organic baby food, cereal bars
todayhealth.today.msnbc.msn.co?m

----

Yet another study in which supplementing with Vitamin D does NOT improve a condition associated with low Vitamin D levels but raises blood calcium--which is dangerous to your heart. Go easy on the Vitamin D folks!


Vitamin D is associated with decreased cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality, possibly by modifying cardiac structure and function, yet firm evidence for either remains lacking.

----

Huge study "Surprisingly, LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol, however, were not associated with stroke risk in this population" (Older women) Triglycerides were.
Lose the carbs, baby! Carbs are what raise triglycerides.

Triglyceride levels predict stroke risk in postmenopausal women

----

Research, mostly rodent, showing raising insulin doesn't cause obesity unless you create hypoglycemia. Don't believe doctors who refuse insulin because "it will make you fat." Dose it right, and it won't. (I lost weight when I started insulin.)

Whole Health Source: Insulin and Obesity: Another Nail in the Coffin

----

MRI scan 'better' for heart patients
A magnetic resonance imaging scan for coronary heart disease is better than the most commonly-used alternative, a major UK trial of heart disease patients has shown.

MRI is better at detecting heart disease, and safer than angiogram since it doesn't involve x-rays.

----

An investigation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that between 1996 and 2008, the amount of leg and foot amputations among U.S. individuals, aged 40+ with diagnosed diabetes dropped. This is good news, but there are still too many people getting amputations, mostly the very old and people in under-served poverty-striken communities who can't afford medical treatment that could lower their blood sugars.

Lower Limb Amputation Rates Associated With Diabetes Drop,

----

Thousands of untested new supplements have flooded the market with only the manufacturer's say-so attesting to their safety. Read this article in full if you buy pills you are told are "natural." They may contain dangerous ingredients.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1113325

April 11, 2012

Is Red Meat Dangerous?

An epidemiological study published a few weeks ago linked the consumption of red meat to a higher risk of death from all causes, cancer, and heart disease. You can read a good summary of it (with a link to the article at the bottom) here:

Science Daily: Red Meat Consumption Linked to Increased Risk of Total, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality.

The study used data from "37,698 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study for up to 22 years and 83,644 women in the Nurses' Health Study for up to 28 years who were free of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer at baseline. Diets were assessed through questionnaires every four years."

The study found that "One daily serving of unprocessed red meat (about the size of a deck of cards) was associated with a 13% increased risk of mortality, and one daily serving of processed red meat (one hot dog or two slices of bacon) was associated with a 20% increased risk."

This isn't the first study to link health problems with red meat so we shouldn't be too quick to dismiss its findings. However, given the methodology it used, we also shouldn't be too quick to blame the red meat for the problems it reveals.

Was it the Meat or What's IN the Meat?

The first problem is with the way the nutritional questionnaires are designed that were used in these studies. They ask questions about people's food habits, along the lines of "How many times in the past month did you eat red meat?" and then give multiple choice options for answers like "Less than 5 times" or "6 to 10 times."

What they don't ask is "Where did you eat your red meat?" "Was your Red Meat filled with MSG?" "Was your red meat fried on a grill covered with damaged oils?" "Was Your Red Meat full of pink slime?"

This is important, because you'd have to be delusional to argue that the red meat sold in most chain restaurants is anything but toxic. People who get a daily serving of red meat from a fast food hamburger probably are shortening their lives. Not because of the meat, but because of what else is in the substance they've been sold as "meat."

Did You Get Fries with That?

The second problem with the questionnaires is that they don't ask "what did you eat WITH your red meat? None of us would question that a "red meat" meal that is made up of 3 ounces (cooked) of pink slime on a bun covered with ketchup, sugary pickles, mayo made out of the cheapest oils, and served with a big side of fries cooked in damaged fat, washed down with a 32 oz sugary soda is likely to have severe health consequences, too. But that's how most people at their meat. And if that is the case, the combination of damaged oils and lots of carbs can explain the negative health consequences without any need to demonize red meat.

The Ambivalent Role of Iron

But even so, other research has turned up some significant problems with iron which may also play a part, though as we'll see, we may not be getting the damaging iron from meat since there are other sources of dietary iron to consider.

Iron is essential to life. Without it our blood couldn't transport oxygen to our cells. But too much iron seems to gum up the works. For more than a decade numerous studies have linked higher than normal levels of iron in the brain to the development of Alzheimer's. Too much iron also damages the beta cell, which is why people who have a genetic condition called hemochromatosis where their iron stores grow abnormally large develop diabetes. But high levels of iron also damage the beta cells in people who don't have this gene.

You can read a good review of how iron can cause or worsen diabetes in this article, which also points out that high iron levels contribute to some complications:

The Role of Iron in Diabetes and Its Complications. Sundararaman Swaminathan. Diabetes Care July 2007 vol. 30 no. 7 1926-1933

What Raises our Iron Stores?

So what raises our blood iron stores? Three ounces (cooked) of hamburger are listed as containing 15% of a typical person's daily need for iron. So you'd have to eat a lot of burgers each day to exceed the iron RDA.

Four ounces of rare roast beef contain 43% of your daily need, so if you are eating 12 ounces of roast beef a day, yes, you are eating what could be dangerous amounts of iron if you were doing this day after day.

But it turns out there is almost twice as much iron in a serving of kidney beans as there is in roast beef. (You can find a good listing of the iron content of various foods HERE) And to keep vegetarians from feeling smug, 3 oz of Tofu contains more iron than three ounces of roast beef.

But that's not where the dangerous amounts of iron are coming from, as the link just cited makes plain. Because it also tells us that a cup of "Oatmeal, fortified instant, prepared" contains two and a half times as much iron as a hefty serving of roast beef, clocking in at 10 mg per serving where the 4 oz of roast contains only 4.2 mg.

The key word to note here is "fortified." Because it isn't just your packaged oatmeal that has extra iron in it. Breakfast cereals do. Cheap breads do, too. And of course, you get 100% of your daily iron RDA in any multivitamin not markets as being for "seniors." More iron is absorbed from your food if you consume a lot of vitamin C either from fruits or vitamin pills. The latter fact may have something to do with why large studies have shown that supplementing with vitamin C for a long time raises the risk of death.

But not all the iron in your body comes from your food. You will also get more iron in your food if you cook it in cast iron pans. And cans made out of steel may also contribute iron to your diet, especially if they contain acidic foods. (Details HERE.)

In short, it's very likely that high iron consumption is dangerous. But most of the iron you consume is not coming from the red meat you eat. It might be informative to run a few day's worth of food consumption through some nutritional software to see exactly how much iron you are taking in each day. (This won't, of course account for iron coming in from pans or cans.) If you are consuming a lot of iron, cut back. It might help lower your blood sugar over time.

If your iron intake is high, you might also ask your doctor to measure your ferritin level at your next physical. The hemochromatosis gene is fairly widespread in European populations with 1 in 8 to 12 carrying it and 5 in 1,000 having the two copies that cause damagingly high levels of iron in the blood

it would also be a very good idea for all of us to limit our consumption of red meat to quality meats, avoiding the chemical-laden patties sold in restaurants.

March 10, 2011

Research Round Up

Here are some more items I've collected over the past few months that don't justify a separate post but are still of interest. Click on the link to see the study.

  1. Users of DPP-4 Inhibitors (i.e. Januvia and Onglyza) report far more infections than metformin users, especially respiratory infections which were twelve times more likely. This is not surprising, DPP-4 plays a significant role in the immune system and turning it off modifies how the immune system works.
  2. Alpha cells secrete glutamate that damages beta cells. There have been several intriguing studies recently that suggest that an imbalance between the alpha cells that secrete glucagon, the hormone that raises blood sugar, and the insulin-secreting beta cells may play a part in causing diabetes. Keep an eye on this topic for further developments.
  3. WHI finds NO relationship between blood Vitamin D levels and the later development of Type 2 diabetes in older women over a 7.3 year period. More cold water thrown on the latest fad cure-all. There may be reasons to normalize vitamin D levels, but I have been able to find zero evidence that preventing or improving diabetes is among them.
  4. Whole fat dairy consumption lowers insulin resistance, raises HDL and correlates with "a substantially lower incidence of diabetes." The researchers who discovered this, by analyzing data from the 3736 adults studied in the Cardiovascular Health Study, appear to have been so disturbed by the implications of their study that they gave it a title that will keep anyone from noticing what they found, which is that eating butter and cream will improve your cardiovascular health.
  5. Yet another study finds that A1c is a much better predictor of heart attack than a diabetes diagnosis or other "many other established risk factors" [i.e. cholesterol. "Every 1% increment [over 5.4%] independently predicts a 19% higher odds of MI [myocardial infarction, i.e. heart attack] after accounting for other MI risk factors including diabetes."

  6. Higher saturated fat intake slows the progression of coronary artery disease in post-menopausal women. Carbohydrate intake speeds it up. In addition, "polyunsaturated fat intake was positively associated with progression when replacing other fats (P = 0.04) but not when replacing carbohydrate or protein. Monounsaturated and total fat intakes were not associated with progression."

  7. Cortisone injections relieve pain of tendon problems in the short term but make them worse and more likely to recur long term. Tendon problems like frozen shoulder are a common diabetic complication. The evidence suggests that the best way to treat them is to leave them alone. They usually get better on their own in a few months. If they don't, my experience has been that acupuncture may help after the acute inflammation phase is over.
  8. If you don't wash your hands before testing your blood sugar wiping away the first drop of blood and using the second drop will be more accurate--but don't squeeze Shockingly, the journal "Diabetes Care" actually published a study this month that is useful to people with diabetes.
  9. Supplementation with Myo-Inositol may be very helpful in reducing insulin resistance and other characteristics of metabolic syndrome in post-menopausal women Don't go crazy with supplementation, based on this one study, since such studies are often paid for and skewed by companies selling the supplement, but keep alert to see if this finding is confirmed elsewhere.

December 6, 2010

Why You Neet to Get Copies of Your Lab Test Results

Every time you go to the lab to get tested, insist on getting a copy of the results for your own files. You (or your insurance) paid for these tests and they are legally yours, so the lab or your doctor must give you a copy if you ask.

Most doctors will only tell you about abnormal lab test results and if nothing was what they consider abnormal they may only give you either a dumbed out summary or a verbal reassurance that "everything was fine."

Just how misleading this can be is shown by stories of people whose fasting blood sugar was 124 mg/dl who were told they were "fine", when one more mg/dl would have been enough to diagnose diabetes.

I experienced something similar. I was told my calcium values were fine when the normal range went up to 10.3 mg/dl and my reading was 10.3. Subsequent research turned up the fact that the high end of the "normal" range for blood calcium is associated with a significantly raised risk for heart disease.

As it was likely my raised blood calcium was due to overdoing my Vitamin D supplementation (which is a growing problem given the hype about this latest cure-all supplement) I stopped the supplementation since my blood Vitamin D level was far above the level defined anywhere as deficient and in another few months the blood calcium level had dropped to the middle of the range which is much less likely to cause serious health problems.

Keeping copies of truly normal lab results can also be important, because over time you may see a trend upward that points to a developing problem. If your "normal fasting blood sugar" each year was 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 97, and 99 mg/dl these values would all be normal, but point to significant deterioration in your fasting blood sugar control. You'd end up a lot better off if you cut back on your carb intake while still normal than if you waited until it reached 101 mg/dl and you were officially told you were "pre-diabetic."

When you keep the actual copies of your lab tests you will also be able to tell if the doctor has actually done the right tests to determine what is wrong with you. For example, if you come from a family where many relatives have diabetes and have been relying on your doctor's assurance that you don't, it would be helpful to know whether he based this assurance on the fasting glucose test, the A1c, or a random glucose test.

If you are experiencing tingling in your extremities, your doctor should order a Vitamin B-12 test as Vitamin B-12 deficiency can look exactly like diabetic neuropathy and if not treated can cause permanent nerve damage. If you are taking metformin which can in some people cause problems with Vitamin B12 absorption and suddenly develop neuropathy while maintaining normal blood sugars, it is very important to ensure this test has been done.

If your doctor tells you that your cholesterol is too high, it is important to see whether this was based on a total cholesterol number alone, or took into consideration the readings for HDL and Trigycerides which are far more predictive of trouble.

Over the years, diagnostic standards change. This is another reason old lab tests may provide you with useful information years later. When I first ran into problems with my blood sugar, the definition of diabetes was a fasting blood sugar of 140 mg/dl. The cutoff subsequently dropped to 125 mg/dl.

A person who had been assured they weren't diabetic in 1996 based on the old standard might get more insight into why they already had diabetic complications like neuropathy or protein in urine the very day they were diagnosed with diabetes in 2000 if old copies of their fasting blood sugar tests showed they had been in the 130s consistently over the previous decade.

Another reason you want to hold on to your lab test sheets is that for many tests the range that defines normal varies from lab to lab and is not standardized. Labs also use different units for reporting test results. One of the big problems with Vitamin D recommendations is that labs use two different units for reporting blood levels of Vitamin D and people often assume they are deficient because they are looking at recommendations that are given using a unit that is not the one that their lab uses. Only your lab sheet will tell you what unit your lab used.

Insulin and C-peptide analysis are not standardized and and the lab reference ranges are different from lab to lab. Even the same hospital may send your blood draw out to different vendors for analysis so that the reference range will vary from year to year though you go to the same hospital lab. The reference range is essential for interpreting the result and when a test is not standardized, as is the case with insulin and C-peptide you can't compare your readings with those of others who use other labs.

There is another reason why you need to get copies of your test results right after you go to the lab. As I learned the hard way, after a few years it may be impossible to retrieve older lab results from the lab or your doctor.

Hospital labs do not keep results online for more than a few years. They are continually changing their computer systems and each time they make a change they get rid of old data. I found one set of labs impossible to retrieve from a local hospital only 3 years after they were done.

Doctors will have your old labs in their records, but you will lose access to those if you move to a new doctor. Even when you ask your old doctor to forward your medical records to the new doctor, what actually happens is that the doctor is sent a summary sheet not the actual records, which are put in storage somewhere and can be difficult or impossible to access if you need them.

If your doctor retires or moves to a new practice there may also be a brief period during which you can get your records, after which they may become impossible to retrieve.

When you get your lab tests you will often see values flagged as high that your doctor has not mentioned. The most common of these is the BUN which is often elevated in people who are eating a low carb diet because the low carb diet induces a degree of dehydration that affects the test result but does not cause any health problems. If you see a value on your lab sheet that concerns you, ask your doctor about it. There are also sites on the internet that explain the various test results and what they mean.

If you are paying for your lab tests as too many of us are, keeping copies of old tests can help you avoid unnecessary tests. If a doctor routinely schedules certain tests which you have long had normal values for, feel free to ask what the point of the testing might be.

All too often, the point of the test is to allow the doctor to qualify for some benefit to himself from imbecilic insurance-company sponsored programs that judge the quality of medical care by how many patients are given total cholesterol tests or quarterly A1c tests (irrespective of the value the tests show.)

If there is no health problem you need to diagnose or medication change you might make based on the result, there is no reason to pay for expensive testing.

When you go to a lab ask the person who does the test what the procedure is at that lab for getting your results. Some labs will give you the results as soon as they are ready if you show a driver's license. Others require you to fill out a form and will mail them to you.

It is helpful to get the results before your doctor's appointment so that you can discuss any issue you find in them. However, if you don't get a copy before the appointment, you can always ask the doctor to have a copy made at the front desk and can take that copy home with you.

 

October 28, 2010

Red Yeast Rice: Another Dangerous Supplement

The public continues to buy the argument that "natural" products are safer and healthier than pharmaceuticals, despite ample proof that this is not true.

The main reason why is this: in the 1990s wealthy large companies paid for expensive PR campaigns that appealed to the public's paranoia, convincing many that the government was trying to take away their wonderful supplements. At the same time, the industry paid large amounts into the campaign coffers of "anti-regulation" senators and in return they got the law they wanted that prohibits the government from regulating supplements. (Details about how the industry destroyed the FDA's ability to regulate supplements can be found in this Harvard Law School publication HERE.)

As things stand now, manufacturers can sell pretty much anything they want to as long as they don't make health claims on the label and as long as their supplements don't cause enough death or disability to trigger an investigation.

What this means for you the consumer is this: supplement manufacturers can promote their wares as medicines as heavily as they want to, as long as they do not put the claim on the actual bottle they sell. They can put it on a web site. They can pay a PR person to plant articles in health magazines, and they can send brochures to self-appointed alternative medicine "practitioners." And, believe me, they do.

Supplement manufacturers often sell their extremely expensive products with the argument that the natural supplement is a better choice than a pharmaceutical drug. For example, they may tell you that soy isoflavones are better than pharmaceutical estrogen at menopause. Or that you can control your blood pressure by taking magnesium rather than blood pressure medication. As long as they don't put this false claim on the label, the FDA cannot step in. It's worthy of note that if a health claim is supported, it CAN be put on the label. But if that is the case the FDA would then be able to treat the supplement as a drug and test it to see if the bottle contains what it says it does.

In most cases, it doesn't. Which is why you will never see any health claim on supplement labels.

Every time anyone takes bottles of supplements to the lab they find that these bottles do NOT contain what they say they do. They may not contain any of the expensive herb or chemical you are paying for or they may contain an amount of that substance that is quite different from what they list on the label.

Sometimes the bottle you just paid $23.95 for contains little beyond some calcium carbonate pills. But though you are frequently not getting what you paid for, at other times the pills you buy may contain too much. And since some supplements are toxic in large doses this is a concern. Even within a single bottle, given the lax manufacturing practices in this unregulated industry, pill to pill the ingredients may vary.

And the problems with what's in that bottle go beyond fluctuating doses. The pills you buy may also contain poisons. These may occur in the form of heavy metals, industrial contaminants (solvents etc.), and the naturally occurring toxins that come from fungal or bacterial contamination.

A recent lab analysis of what was in the bottles of 12 brands of Red Yeast Rice, a supplement marketed for controlling cholesterol, makes it crystal clear why if you do find yourself needing medicinal treatment, you should avoid the use of unregulated supplements.

The study can be found here: Marked Variability of Monacolin Levels in Commercial Red Yeast Rice Products Ram Y. Gordon et al. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2010; 170 (19): 1722 DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.382

You can read a more detailed report about this study's findings here: Science Daily: Active ingredient levels vary among red yeast rice supplements.

THIS "NATURAL" STATIN REPLACEMENT CONTAINS ACTUAL STATINS

People take Red Yeast Rice to lower cholesterol instead of statins, rightly fearing the problems that statins can cause. What the supplement industry does not make clear is that the reason Red Yeast Rice may lower cholesterol is that it contains a chemical, monacolin K, which is chemically identical to the chemical marketed as the pharmaceutical drug lovastatin.

THE AMOUNT OF STATIN IN A RED YEAST RICE PILL CAN RANGE FROM ALMOST NONE TO WAY TOO MUCH

The main difference between statin in the red yeast rice pill you buy and pharmaceutical lovastatin is that the amount of lovastatin you get in the "natural" supplement is completely unknown. In the study cited above, researchers found that the concentration of lovastatin in the 12 different branded bottles varied from 0.10 to 10.09 mg per capsule. That's a significant range!

Since the size of the dose of statin you take has a lot to do with both its effectiveness and with whether it will cause the severe side effects that statins cause (including brain damage leading to mild, irreversible dementia and muscle wasting) it is extremely unwise to take your statin in a form where you have no idea how much you are getting. This study clearly shows that when you buy your statin as a "natural supplement" you may be getting almost none, some, or too much. Why play Russian Roulette with your meds?

THE NATURAL SUPPLEMENT CONTAINS ADDITIONAL TOXIC CONTAMINANTS ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR PEOPLE WITH DIABETES

But that's not the only problem with Red Yeast Rice. The other problem is that because it is an unregulated "natural" product which is created by growing funguses on rice, it often contains other funguses--some of which produce poisons.

In the case of Red Yeast Rice the fungus-produced toxin that produced by the funguses that grow alongside of those that produce the statin is called citrinin. It is a toxin known to destroy the kidneys in animals.

The study cited above found "elevated levels" of citrinin in four out of twelve brands of Red Yeast Rice products it evaluated. (The phrasing suggests the researchers also may have found lower levels in other bottles.) Sadly, the researchers did not reveal to the public which brands contained this toxin. My guess is that they did this out of a fear of lawsuits brought by the companies who earn billions each year from selling you this toxic crap.

I would have to say that one of the most common questions I get in my email from readers of this blog and the Blood Sugar 101 web site is "What supplements do you recommend I take." Many of my correspondents will accompany this question with a long list of supplements they are already taking.
Sadly, many of them are taking red yeast rice in the erroneous belief that it is safer and healthier than the statins that doctors push on people with diabetes.

Since so many people with diabetes already have early kidney damage at the time they receive their diabetes diagnosis, this is disturbing news. The last thing a person with diabetes needs is to be taking a supplement that contains a chemical known to poison the kidneys.

THE SUPPLEMENT INDUSTRY ENSURES THAT THEIR TOXIC PRODUCTS WILL STAY ON THE SHELF

As things stand now, the FDA can act against a supplement only after doctors report damage to patients that is linked to their taking a specific supplement. But because doctors expect people with diabetes to develop kidney failure and may not even know their patients are taking these alternative medicine forms of statins, it is very unlikely that the damage that kidney-toxic red yeast rice may be wreaking will ever be noticed.

There are real problems with statins, but at least when you take a statin you bought at the pharmacy you can be sure that the capsule contains the dose you were told it did and that it is not contaminated with poisons.

The same is true of every other supplement you may buy. And given the amounts of money that corporations who profit from selling you dangerous crap are paying into the campaigns of candidates howling for more "deregulation" you can be sure it isn't going to change any time soon.

If you really want to protect your health, avoid all supplements. You have no way of knowing what is in any of them. Some companies claim that their supplements have been tested for purity. However, when I investigated these claims in the past, I learned that all this means is that one batch was taken to the lab, once. There is no assurance that what you buy will match the lab assay provided (and the small print that accompanies these claims of lab-proven purity is full of legal weasel-wording.)

Other potentially damaging supplements include kelp, all of which is contaminated with arsenic. When I contacted supplement companies about this I was told that finding arsenic in natural kelp it was "normal." None denied the claim that their products contained arsenic. Arsenic exposure has been implicated as a cause of diabetes. (Details HERE).

Fish oil may contain mercury. Vitamin D capsules appear to contain amounts of Vitamin D that do not correspond to the label Details HERE.

The supplement industry always responds to these kinds of reports by appealing to anti-government paranoia. "This is a plot by the FDA to take away your freedom" is the usual response.

Personally I would like to take away the freedom of a cynical multi-billion dollar industry to sell you whatever it feels like putting in a pill, slapping a label on the bottle that lies about its contents, and to ignore the fact it is charging you a fortune for toxins that can shorten your life and make what is left of it miserable.